Skip to content
Do They Represent Me?

Should vilification complaints about race, religion, sex, sexuality, disability or gender identity be judged from a reasonable targeted-group member's viewpoint, not an ordinary reasonable person's?

Both houses · 4 votes

Background

Vilification means public conduct that is hateful or seriously contemptuous towards people, or reviles (abuses) or severely ridicules them, because of an attribute such as race or religion. The 2024 bill replaced the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001. It extended vilification protections beyond race and religion to disability, gender identity, sex, sex characteristics and sexual orientation, and created criminal offences of inciting hatred (up to 3 years) and threatening harm (up to 5 years). Its new civil test — which leads to a complaint, not a criminal charge — asks whether a reasonable person with the targeted attribute would consider public conduct hateful, seriously contemptuous, reviling or severely ridiculing; there are good-faith exceptions for artistic, academic, religious, scientific and public-interest purposes. The Coalition moved to judge it by an ordinary reasonable person instead.

What each side said

Summarised from the debate in Parliament, with sources below.

For “agree”

Supporters said existing laws protected only race and religion and rarely worked, and that the harm test should be judged by someone from the targeted community: "whoever you love, you deserve to be safe in our state, free of hate" (Sonya Kilkenny, ALP, 20 Feb 2025). Legalise Cannabis said "It is not a prohibition of critique of ideas" (Rachel Payne, Council). The Greens, who had introduced their own bill, supported the civil test while warning the criminal offences could be misused against marginalised groups (Gabrielle de Vietri, 5 Feb 2025). Animal Justice also voted on this side.

For “disagree”

The Coalition said it supported adding the new groups but opposed the civil test judged from the view of a person with the attribute as uncertain and unfair, and moved to remove those words (Evan Mulholland, Liberal, Council); "This bill will make things worse, not better" (Michael O'Brien, Liberal). The Shooters objected to "the subjective part of it" (Jeff Bourman); One Nation said the laws threaten free speech (Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell), and the Libertarian and Moira Deeming (now Family First) also opposed the civil provisions.

How the parties voted

Across the linked votes below. Second and third readings count five times as much as other votes. Parties are in alphabetical order. How this is worked out

How each party voted across the linked votes
Party Record Votes with a party position
Animal Justice Consistently for 3 of 3
Greens Consistently for 3 of 4
Labor Consistently for 4 of 4
Legalise Cannabis Consistently for 3 of 3
Liberal Consistently against 4 of 4
Libertarian Consistently against 3 of 3
Nationals Consistently against 4 of 4
One Nation Consistently against 3 of 3
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Consistently against 3 of 3

The votes behind this question

Each vote (division) recorded in Parliament that this question is based on, in date order.

20 February 2025 · Legislative Assembly

Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024

Question put
Question — That this Bill be now read a second time, Government amendment Nos 1 and 2 be agreed to and the Bill be now read a third time — put.
Result
Question agreed to. Ayes 50, Noes 25.
Matches “agree”
An Aye vote
Weight
Strong: a second or third reading, counted five times
Why it's linked
Third reading (Assembly). Aye = support the bill; agree = Aye.
How each party voted on Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024, 20 February 2025
Party Aye No Position
Greens 0 0 Did not vote
Labor 49 0 Aye
Liberal 0 17 No
Nationals 0 8 No

Independents, each counted on their own: Will Fowles (Aye)

Every name (Ayes 50, Noes 25) in the vote of 20 February 2025

Ayes (50)

Juliana Addison, Jacinta Allan, Colin Brooks, Josh Bull, Anthony Carbines, Ben Carroll, Anthony Cianflone, Sarah Connolly, Chris Couzens, Jordan Crugnale, Lily D'Ambrosio, Daniela De Martino, Steve Dimopoulos, Paul Edbrooke, Eden Foster, Will Fowles, Matt Fregon, Ella George, Luba Grigorovitch, Bronwyn Halfpenny, Katie Hall, Paul Hamer, Martha Haylett, Mathew Hilakari, Melissa Horne, Natalie Hutchins, Sonya Kilkenny, Nathan Lambert, Gary Maas, Alison Marchant, Kathleen Matthews-Ward, Steve McGhie, Paul Mercurio, John Mullahy, Pauline Richards, Tim Richardson, Michaela Settle, Ros Spence, Nick Staikos, Natalie Suleyman, Meng Heang Tak, Jackson Taylor, Nina Taylor, Kat Theophanous, Mary-Anne Thomas, Iwan Walters, Vicki Ward, Dylan Wight, Gabrielle Williams, Belinda Wilson

Noes (25)

Brad Battin, Jade Benham, Roma Britnell, Tim Bull, Martin Cameron, Annabelle Cleeland, Chris Crewther, Wayne Farnham, Sam Groth, Matthew Guy, David Hodgett, Emma Kealy, Tim McCurdy, Cindy McLeish, James Newbury, Danny O'Brien, Michael O'Brien, Kim O'Keeffe, John Pesutto, Richard Riordan, Brad Rowswell, David Southwick, Bridget Vallence, Kim Wells, Jess Wilson

Official record: Votes and Proceedings Nos 109 to 111 (LA-60-111-03)

1 April 2025 · Legislative Council

Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024

Question put
12 JUSTICE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (ANTI-VILIFICATION AND SOCIAL COHESION) BILL 2024 — Debate resumed on the question, That the Bill be now read a second time.
Result
Question agreed to. Ayes 22, Noes 17.
Matches “agree”
An Aye vote
Weight
Strong: a second or third reading, counted five times
Why it's linked
Second reading (Council). Aye = support the bill; agree = Aye.
How each party voted on Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024, 1 April 2025
Party Aye No Position
Animal Justice 1 0 Aye
Greens 4 0 Aye
Labor 15 0 Aye
Legalise Cannabis 2 0 Aye
Liberal 0 12 No
Libertarian 0 1 No
Nationals 0 2 No
One Nation 0 1 No
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 0 1 No
Every name (Ayes 22, Noes 17) in the vote of 1 April 2025

Ayes (22)

Ryan Batchelor, John Berger, Lizzie Blandthorn, Katherine Copsey, Enver Erdogan, Jacinta Ermacora, David Ettershank, Michael Galea, Anasina Gray-Barberio, Shaun Leane, Sarah Mansfield, Tom McIntosh, Rachel Payne, Aiv Puglielli, Georgie Purcell, Harriet Shing, Ingrid Stitt, Jaclyn Symes, Lee Tarlamis, Sonja Terpstra, Gayle Tierney, Sheena Watt

Noes (17)

Melina Bath, Jeff Bourman, Gaelle Broad, Georgie Crozier, David Davis, Moira Deeming, Renee Heath, Ann-Marie Hermans, David Limbrick, Wendy Lovell, Trung Luu, Bev McArthur, Joe McCracken, Nick McGowan, Evan Mulholland, Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell, Richard Welch

Official record: Minutes of the Proceedings Nos. 110, 111 and 112 (LC-60-110-01)

1 April 2025 · Legislative Council

Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024

Question put
Jaclyn Symes moved, That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Result
Question agreed to. Ayes 22, Noes 17.
Matches “agree”
An Aye vote
Weight
Strong: a second or third reading, counted five times
Why it's linked
Third reading (Council). Aye = support the bill; agree = Aye.
How each party voted on Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024, 1 April 2025
Party Aye No Position
Animal Justice 1 0 Aye
Greens 4 0 Aye
Labor 15 0 Aye
Legalise Cannabis 2 0 Aye
Liberal 0 12 No
Libertarian 0 1 No
Nationals 0 2 No
One Nation 0 1 No
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 0 1 No
Every name (Ayes 22, Noes 17) in the vote of 1 April 2025

Ayes (22)

Ryan Batchelor, John Berger, Lizzie Blandthorn, Katherine Copsey, Enver Erdogan, Jacinta Ermacora, David Ettershank, Michael Galea, Anasina Gray-Barberio, Shaun Leane, Sarah Mansfield, Tom McIntosh, Rachel Payne, Aiv Puglielli, Georgie Purcell, Harriet Shing, Ingrid Stitt, Jaclyn Symes, Lee Tarlamis, Sonja Terpstra, Gayle Tierney, Sheena Watt

Noes (17)

Melina Bath, Jeff Bourman, Gaelle Broad, Georgie Crozier, David Davis, Moira Deeming, Renee Heath, Ann-Marie Hermans, David Limbrick, Wendy Lovell, Trung Luu, Bev McArthur, Joe McCracken, Nick McGowan, Evan Mulholland, Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell, Richard Welch

Official record: Minutes of the Proceedings Nos. 110, 111 and 112 (LC-60-110-03)

1 April 2025 · Legislative Council

Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024

Question put
Question — That the amendment be agreed to — put.
Result
Question negatived. Ayes 17, Noes 22.
Matches “agree”
A No vote
Weight
Normal
Why it's linked
Council committee vote on the Coalition amendment (EM25C No. 1) to judge the civil test by an ordinary reasonable person. Aye = ordinary-person test; agree = No.
How each party voted on Justice Legislation Amendment (Anti-Vilification And Social Cohesion) Bill 2024, 1 April 2025
Party Aye No Position
Animal Justice 0 1 No
Greens 0 4 No
Labor 0 15 No
Legalise Cannabis 0 2 No
Liberal 12 0 Aye
Libertarian 1 0 Aye
Nationals 2 0 Aye
One Nation 1 0 Aye
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 1 0 Aye
Every name (Ayes 17, Noes 22) in the vote of 1 April 2025

Ayes (17)

Melina Bath, Jeff Bourman, Gaelle Broad, Georgie Crozier, David Davis, Moira Deeming, Renee Heath, Ann-Marie Hermans, David Limbrick, Wendy Lovell, Trung Luu, Bev McArthur, Joe McCracken, Nick McGowan, Evan Mulholland, Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell, Richard Welch

Noes (22)

Ryan Batchelor, John Berger, Lizzie Blandthorn, Katherine Copsey, Enver Erdogan, Jacinta Ermacora, David Ettershank, Michael Galea, Anasina Gray-Barberio, Shaun Leane, Sarah Mansfield, Tom McIntosh, Rachel Payne, Aiv Puglielli, Georgie Purcell, Harriet Shing, Ingrid Stitt, Jaclyn Symes, Lee Tarlamis, Sonja Terpstra, Gayle Tierney, Sheena Watt

Official record: Minutes of the Proceedings Nos. 110, 111 and 112 (LC-60-112-06)

Sources

Spotted a mistake? Report a problem