Skip to content
Do They Represent Me?

Should commercial logging of native forests on public land in Victoria stay banned by law?

Both houses · 3 votes

Background

Commercial logging of native (natural, not plantation) forest on public land stopped on 1 January 2024, six years earlier than the previously planned 2030 end, under a government decision announced in the May 2023 Budget; the Government put its total support for the forestry transition, including for workers and families, at more than $875 million. The Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024 put the end into law: it repealed the Act that authorised the logging, abolished VicForests and made it an offence to take timber from a state forest mainly for sale.

What each side said

Summarised from the debate in Parliament, with sources below.

For “agree”

Supporters said logging had become unviable after bushfires and court rulings, and that delay would hurt workers: "The longer you delay this transition, the harder it is for those workers" (Nina Taylor, ALP, 29 May 2024). The Greens and Animal Justice backed it on environmental grounds: "Forests are for conservation, not for profit" (Sarah Mansfield, Greens, 20 Jun 2024). Legalise Cannabis also voted on this side.

For “disagree”

Opponents said the industry was sustainable and "never had to end" (Emma Kealy, Nationals, 29 May 2024), that closure cost regional jobs and bushfire-fighting capacity, and that Victoria would import timber from places with weaker standards (Melina Bath, Nationals, 20 Jun 2024). The Coalition's reasoned amendments asked that the bill not proceed until affected workers and businesses received fair compensation. The Libertarian voted for the bill only because the industry had already closed, saying a sustainable and professional logging industry could operate in Victoria (David Limbrick, 20 Jun 2024). One Nation and Moira Deeming (now Family First) also voted on this side.

How the parties voted

Across the linked votes below. Second and third readings count five times as much as other votes. Parties are in alphabetical order. How this is worked out

How each party voted across the linked votes
Party Record Votes with a party position
Animal Justice Consistently for 2 of 2
Greens Consistently for 3 of 3
Labor Consistently for 3 of 3
Legalise Cannabis Consistently for 2 of 2
Liberal Consistently against 3 of 3
Libertarian voted for the bill but opposed the closure (see note) 2 of 2
Nationals Consistently against 3 of 3
One Nation Consistently against 2 of 2
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Did not vote 0 of 2

The votes behind this question

Each vote (division) recorded in Parliament that this question is based on, in date order.

30 May 2024 · Legislative Assembly

Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024

Question put
Question — That the words proposed to be omitted stand part of the question — put.
Result
Question agreed to. Ayes 53, Noes 24.
Matches “agree”
An Aye vote
Weight
Normal
Why it's linked
Assembly reasoned amendment moved by Emma Kealy; the question was whether to keep the words "be now read a second time". Aye = reject the amendment (let the bill proceed); agree = Aye.
How each party voted on Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024, 30 May 2024
Party Aye No Position
Greens 4 0 Aye
Labor 49 0 Aye
Liberal 0 16 No
Nationals 0 8 No
Every name (Ayes 53, Noes 24) in the vote of 30 May 2024

Ayes (53)

Juliana Addison, Jacinta Allan, Colin Brooks, Josh Bull, Anthony Carbines, Ben Carroll, Anthony Cianflone, Sarah Connolly, Chris Couzens, Lily D'Ambrosio, Daniela De Martino, Steve Dimopoulos, Paul Edbrooke, Eden Foster, Matt Fregon, Ella George, Luba Grigorovitch, Bronwyn Halfpenny, Katie Hall, Paul Hamer, Martha Haylett, Sam Hibbins, Mathew Hilakari, Melissa Horne, Natalie Hutchins, Lauren Kathage, Sonya Kilkenny, Gary Maas, Alison Marchant, Kathleen Matthews-Ward, Steve McGhie, Paul Mercurio, John Mullahy, Tim Pallas, Danny Pearson, Tim Read, Pauline Richards, Tim Richardson, Ellen Sandell, Michaela Settle, Ros Spence, Nick Staikos, Natalie Suleyman, Meng Heang Tak, Jackson Taylor, Nina Taylor, Kat Theophanous, Mary-Anne Thomas, Emma Vulin, Iwan Walters, Dylan Wight, Belinda Wilson, Gabrielle de Vietri

Noes (24)

Brad Battin, Jade Benham, Roma Britnell, Martin Cameron, Annabelle Cleeland, Chris Crewther, Wayne Farnham, Sam Groth, Matthew Guy, Emma Kealy, Tim McCurdy, Cindy McLeish, James Newbury, Danny O'Brien, Michael O'Brien, Kim O'Keeffe, John Pesutto, Richard Riordan, Brad Rowswell, David Southwick, Peter Walsh, Kim Wells, Nicole Werner, Jess Wilson

Official record: Votes and Proceedings Nos 73 to 75 (LA-60-075-01)

20 June 2024 · Legislative Council

Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024

Question put
Question — That the reasoned amendment moved by Melina Bath be agreed to — put.
Result
Question negatived. Ayes 14, Noes 22.
Matches “agree”
A No vote
Weight
Normal
Why it's linked
Council reasoned amendment moved by Melina Bath to stop the bill proceeding. Aye = support the amendment (oppose the bill now); agree = No.
How each party voted on Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024, 20 June 2024
Party Aye No Position
Animal Justice 0 1 No
Greens 0 4 No
Labor 0 14 No
Legalise Cannabis 0 2 No
Liberal 11 0 Aye
Libertarian 0 1 No
Nationals 1 0 Aye
One Nation 1 0 Aye
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 0 0 Did not vote

Independents, each counted on their own: Moira Deeming (Aye)

Every name (Ayes 14, Noes 22) in the vote of 20 June 2024

Ayes (14)

Melina Bath, Georgie Crozier, David Davis, Moira Deeming, Renee Heath, Ann-Marie Hermans, Wendy Lovell, Trung Luu, Bev McArthur, Joe McCracken, Nick McGowan, Evan Mulholland, Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell, Richard Welch

Noes (22)

Ryan Batchelor, John Berger, Lizzie Blandthorn, Katherine Copsey, Enver Erdogan, Jacinta Ermacora, David Ettershank, Michael Galea, Shaun Leane, David Limbrick, Sarah Mansfield, Tom McIntosh, Rachel Payne, Aiv Puglielli, Georgie Purcell, Samantha Ratnam, Harriet Shing, Ingrid Stitt, Jaclyn Symes, Lee Tarlamis, Sonja Terpstra, Sheena Watt

Official record: Minutes of the Proceedings Nos. 71, 72 and 73 (LC-60-073-03)

20 June 2024 · Legislative Council

Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024

Question put
Jaclyn Symes moved, That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Result
Question agreed to. Ayes 20, Noes 12.
Matches “agree”
An Aye vote
Weight
Strong: a second or third reading, counted five times
Why it's linked
Third reading (Council). Aye = support the bill; agree = Aye.
How each party voted on Sustainable Forests (Timber) Repeal Bill 2024, 20 June 2024
Party Aye No Position
Animal Justice 1 0 Aye
Greens 4 0 Aye
Labor 12 0 Aye
Legalise Cannabis 2 0 Aye
Liberal 0 9 No
Libertarian 1 0 Aye
Nationals 0 1 No
One Nation 0 1 No
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 0 0 Did not vote

Independents, each counted on their own: Moira Deeming (No)

Every name (Ayes 20, Noes 12) in the vote of 20 June 2024

Ayes (20)

Ryan Batchelor, John Berger, Lizzie Blandthorn, Katherine Copsey, Enver Erdogan, Jacinta Ermacora, David Ettershank, Michael Galea, Shaun Leane, David Limbrick, Sarah Mansfield, Tom McIntosh, Rachel Payne, Aiv Puglielli, Georgie Purcell, Samantha Ratnam, Ingrid Stitt, Jaclyn Symes, Sonja Terpstra, Sheena Watt

Noes (12)

Melina Bath, Georgie Crozier, Moira Deeming, Ann-Marie Hermans, Wendy Lovell, Trung Luu, Bev McArthur, Joe McCracken, Nick McGowan, Evan Mulholland, Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell, Richard Welch

Official record: Minutes of the Proceedings Nos. 71, 72 and 73 (LC-60-073-04)

Sources

Spotted a mistake? Report a problem